> > > > +' > > > + > > > +test_expect_success 'push --atomic shows all failed refs' ' > > > + # Make up/master, up/allrefs > > > + d=$HTTPD_DOCUMENT_ROOT_PATH/atomic-failed-refs.git && > > > + git init --bare "$d" && > > > + git --git-dir="$d" config http.receivepack true && > > > + up="$HTTPD_URL"/smart/atomic-failed-refs.git && > > > + test_commit allrefs1 && > > > + test_commit allrefs2 && > > > + git branch allrefs && > > > + git push "$up" master allrefs && > > > + # Make master and allrefs incompatible with up/master, up/allrefs > > > + git checkout allrefs && > > > + git reset --hard HEAD^ && > > > + git checkout master && > > > + git reset --hard HEAD^ && > > > + # --atomic should complain about both master and allrefs > > > + test_must_fail git push --atomic "$up" master allrefs >&output && > > > + grep master output && > > > + grep allrefs output > > > +' > > > > I have the impression that the setup these two new test cases perform are > > _very_ similar, making it most likely that a combined test case would be > > more succinct, yet still complete and easily readable. > > (Junio replied to this downthread... I have more to ask too.) Oops, I misremembered which comment he had replied to. Yeah, I'll think about this and reword. Reroll to come shortly. Thanks, all. - Emily
