Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> writes: > Please note that the problem is _not_ MinGW! The problem is that the > non-JIT'ted code path is a lot more stringent than the JIT'ted one. So > what you'd need is a prerequisite that tests whether the PCREv2 in use > supports JIT'ted code or not, and skip the test case in the latter one. Hmph, so additional prereq !MINGW may happen to match "do we use pcre sans jit?" but not a right thing to use here?
