Philip Oakley <philipoakley@xxxxxxx> writes:
>> I suspect the question is in regards to "What branch did I create
>> my local branch from?", especially given the pull request
>> reference.
>>
>> In other words, when I locally do:
>> git checkout --no-track -b bturner-some-bugfix origin/release/5.16
>>
>> release/5.16 is the "parent branch" of my bugfix branch...
>> ...
> From the Git side, maybe one could simply populate the branch
> description with the commit oid and branched-from name at the time of
> branch creation (no doubt set as a core.option).
> The field is already there and almost never used - there's no easy way
> (via git command) to populate the description anyway. Plus its a local
> field, keeping Git distributed.
I do not think you want branch.description to get mixed-up in this.
In this whole thread, I have been wondering if I am missing
something crucial, but now I am deeply puzzled why after many people
made comments, nobody raises a question about the "--no-track" thing
in the early message in the thread.
If you do not add that, i.e.
$ git checout -t -b bturner-some-bugfix origin/release/5.16
(note that I added '-t' for illustration, but it should be on by
default when starting from origin/<whatever>), then you'd get in
your configuration file these recorded:
$ git config --get-regexp 'branch\.bturner-some-bugfix\..*'
branch.bturner-some-bugfix.remote origin
branch.bturner-some-bugfix.merge refs/heads/release/5.16
You created 'bturner-some-bugfix' branch out of the 'release/5.16'
branch taken from the remote whose name is 'origin'.
Is that different from the answer to the question being sought?
What am I missing???
