On Mon, Jul 01, 2019 at 05:16:02AM -0400, Jeff King wrote:
> I see Gábor suggested using "wc -c" elsewhere in the thread. That would
> be fine with me, too, though I think the required sed there may be
> getting pretty unreadable, too. :)
It could be done even without 'sed', though at the expense of running
a coupe more 'wc -c's in a loop:
diff --git a/t/t5319-multi-pack-index.sh b/t/t5319-multi-pack-index.sh
index 79bfaeafa9..bacec5e2e4 100755
--- a/t/t5319-multi-pack-index.sh
+++ b/t/t5319-multi-pack-index.sh
@@ -443,7 +443,12 @@ test_expect_success 'repack with minimum size does not alter existing packs' '
touch -m -t 201901010002 .git/objects/pack/pack-B* &&
touch -m -t 201901010003 .git/objects/pack/pack-A* &&
ls .git/objects/pack >expect &&
- MINSIZE=$(ls -l .git/objects/pack/*pack | awk "{print \$5;}" | sort -n | head -n 1) &&
+ MINSIZE=$(
+ for pack in .git/objects/pack/*pack
+ do
+ wc -c <"$pack"
+ done | sort -n | head -n 1
+ ) &&
git multi-pack-index repack --batch-size=$MINSIZE &&
ls .git/objects/pack >actual &&
test_cmp expect actual
@@ -455,7 +460,12 @@ test_expect_success 'repack creates a new pack' '
cd dup &&
ls .git/objects/pack/*idx >idx-list &&
test_line_count = 5 idx-list &&
- THIRD_SMALLEST_SIZE=$(ls -l .git/objects/pack/*pack | awk "{print \$5;}" | sort -n | head -n 3 | tail -n 1) &&
+ THIRD_SMALLEST_SIZE=$(
+ for pack in .git/objects/pack/*pack
+ do
+ wc -c <"$pack"
+ done | sort -n | head -n 3 | tail -n 1
+ ) &&
BATCH_SIZE=$(($THIRD_SMALLEST_SIZE + 1)) &&
git multi-pack-index repack --batch-size=$BATCH_SIZE &&
ls .git/objects/pack/*idx >idx-list &&
Is it really better? Dunno, but at least there is no subtlety with
the leading padding spaces.
