Hi,
On Thu, 27 Jun 2019, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> "Quentin Nerden via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
> > From: Quentin Nerden <quentin.nerden@xxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > To make the doc of git-clone easier to read,
> > refer to the long version of the options
> > (it is easier to guess what --verbose is doing than -v).
> >
> > Also:
> > put the short options first, to match the doc of git-add, git-commit, git-clean, git-branch...
>
> This "also" makes the patch unnecessarily harder to review.
> Splitting it into two patches would make it reviewable.
Good idea.
The easiest way I can think of would be to split by first undoing the
commit via `git reset --hard HEAD^` (don't worry, the commit graph is
still accessible via the reflog), then staging the parts of the patch that
put the short options first: `git checkout -p HEAD@{1}`. After that is
done, commit with a new commit message, then get the remainder of the
changes via `git cherry-pick HEAD@{2}` (by now, the original commit is no
longer `HEAD@{1}` because a new commit has been appended to the reflog).
Then force-push and submit a new iteration ;-)
Ciao,
Johannes
