Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > > Dimitriy Ryazantcev <dimitriy.ryazantcev@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > Currenly the data rate in throughput_string(...) method is > > output by simple strbuf_humanise_bytes(...) call and '/s' append. > > But for proper translation of such string the translator needs > > full context. > > > > Add strbuf_humanise_rate(...) method to properly print out > > localizable version of data rate ('3.5 MiB/s' etc) with full context. > > Hmph, so idea is that appending translation of "/s" to translation > of "1.4MiB" may not be a good enough translation of "1.4MiB/s"? > > That does sounds like a good idea, but looking at the heavy > duplication of implementation, I would have to say "Yuck" to it. > > I wonder if an approach like the following illustration would work > better? I am not sure how well Q_() and N_() would interact with > each other, though. Good idea! But unfortunately this will not work properly as xgettext will unable to extract byte/bytes to one plural msgid in *.pot file. Seems it can extract plural forms only from Q_ (ngettext() call) and cannot from _N (gettext_noop() call) in current configuration[0]. Maybe in this case we can try to forward already translated string to strbuf_humanise(): static void strbuf_humanise(struct strbuf *buf, off_t bytes, struct human_format *fmt) { .... } else { strbuf_addf(buf, fmt->byte, (unsigned)bytes); .... } void strbuf_humanise_bytes(struct strbuf *buf, off_t bytes) { struct human_format bytes_fmt = { .giga = _("%u.%2.2u GiB"), .mega = _("%u.%2.2u MiB"), .kilo = _("%u.%2.2u KiB"), .byte = Q_("%u byte", "%u bytes", (unsigned)bytes), }; strbuf_humanise(buf, bytes, &bytes_fmt); } What do you think? [0] https://github.com/git/git/blob/master/Makefile#L2498 > > -- >8 -- > > struct human_format { > const char *giga; > const char *mega; > const char *kilo; > const char *byte; > const char *bytes; > }; > > static void strbuf_humanise(struct strbuf *buf, off_t bytes, struct human_format *fmt) > { > if (bytes > 1 << 30) { > strbuf_addf(buf, _(fmt->giga), > (unsigned)(bytes >> 30), > (unsigned)(bytes & ((1 << 30) - 1)) / 10737419); > } else if (bytes > 1 << 20) { > unsigned x = bytes + 5243; /* for rounding */ > strbuf_addf(buf, _(fmt->mega), > x >> 20, ((x & ((1 << 20) - 1)) * 100) >> 20); > strbuf_addstr(buf, _("")); > } else if (bytes > 1 << 10) { > unsigned x = bytes + 5; /* for rounding */ > strbuf_addf(buf, _(fmt->kilo), > x >> 10, ((x & ((1 << 10) - 1)) * 100) >> 10); > } else { > strbuf_addf(buf, Q_(fmt->byte, fmt->bytes, > (unsigned)bytes), (unsigned)bytes); > } > } > > void strbuf_humanise_bytes(struct strbuf *buf, off_t bytes) > { > struct human_format bytes_fmt = { > .giga = N_("%u.%2.2u GiB"), > .mega = N_("%u.%2.2u MiB"), > .kilo = N_("%u.%2.2u KiB"), > .byte = N_("%u byte"), > .bytes = N_("%u bytes"), > }; > strbuf_humanise(buf, bytes, &bytes_fmt); > } > > void strbuf_humanise_rate(struct strbuf *buf, off_t bytes) > { > struct human_format rate_fmt = { > .giga = N_("%u.%2.2u GiB/s"), > .mega = N_("%u.%2.2u MiB/s"), > .kilo = N_("%u.%2.2u KiB/s"), > .byte = N_("%u byte/s"), > .bytes = N_("%u bytes/s"), > }; > strbuf_humanise(buf, bytes, &rate_fmt); > } -- Sincerely, Dimitriy Ryazantcev