Re: [PATCH] doc: fix form -> from typo

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Martin Ågren <martin.agren@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Hi Catalin
>
> Welcome to the list!
>
> On Tue, 25 Jun 2019 at 09:43, Catalin Criste <cris_linu_w@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> @@ -88,7 +88,7 @@ save [-p|--patch] [-k|--[no-]keep-index] [-u|--include-untracked] [-a|--all] [-q
>>
>>         This option is deprecated in favour of 'git stash push'.  It
>>         differs from "stash push" in that it cannot take pathspecs,
>> -       and any non-option arguments form the message.
>> +       and any non-option arguments from the message.
>
> I think this is actually intended as "form". It took me a couple of
> readings, but what this paragraph wants to say is that any non-option
> arguments will be used to form (construct) the message.
>
> Do you have any suggestions as to how this could be made clearer?
> There are at least two of us that have stumbled on this. :-)

"become"?




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux