Duy Nguyen <pclouds@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jun 22, 2019 at 4:37 PM Dimitriy Ryazantcev
> <dimitriy.ryazantcev@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > diff --git a/strbuf.c b/strbuf.c
> > index 0e18b259ce..0a3ebc3749 100644
> > --- a/strbuf.c
> > +++ b/strbuf.c
> > @@ -814,20 +814,28 @@ void strbuf_addstr_urlencode(struct strbuf *sb, const char *s,
> > void strbuf_humanise_bytes(struct strbuf *buf, off_t bytes)
> > {
> > if (bytes > 1 << 30) {
> > - strbuf_addf(buf, "%u.%2.2u GiB",
> > + strbuf_addf(buf, "%u.%2.2u ",
> > (unsigned)(bytes >> 30),
> > (unsigned)(bytes & ((1 << 30) - 1)) / 10737419);
> > + /* TRANSLATORS: ISO/IEC 80000-13:2008, clause 4: gibi */
> > + strbuf_addstr(buf, _("Gi"));
>
> It may be ISO standard, but GiB to me looks much easier to understand.
> What's the reason for changing GiB to Gi btw?
I just moved 'B' out of else block so it will be prepended with
'Gi'/'Mi'/'Ki' when needed.
Note: I changed 'bytes' to just 'B' unit.
>
> > } else if (bytes > 1 << 20) {
> > unsigned x = bytes + 5243; /* for rounding */
> > - strbuf_addf(buf, "%u.%2.2u MiB",
> > + strbuf_addf(buf, "%u.%2.2u ",
> > x >> 20, ((x & ((1 << 20) - 1)) * 100) >> 20);
> > + /* TRANSLATORS: ISO/IEC 80000-13:2008, clause 4: mebi */
> > + strbuf_addstr(buf, _("Mi"));
> > } else if (bytes > 1 << 10) {
> > unsigned x = bytes + 5; /* for rounding */
> > - strbuf_addf(buf, "%u.%2.2u KiB",
> > + strbuf_addf(buf, "%u.%2.2u ",
> > x >> 10, ((x & ((1 << 10) - 1)) * 100) >> 10);
> > + /* TRANSLATORS: ISO/IEC 80000-13:2008, clause 4: kibi */
> > + strbuf_addstr(buf, _("Ki"));
> > } else {
> > - strbuf_addf(buf, "%u bytes", (unsigned)bytes);
> > + strbuf_addf(buf, "%u ", (unsigned)bytes);
> > }
> > + /* TRANSLATORS: ISO/IEC 80000-13:2008, subclause 13-9.c: byte */
> > + strbuf_addstr(buf, _("B"));
> > }
> >
> > void strbuf_add_absolute_path(struct strbuf *sb, const char *path)
> > --
> > 2.22.0
> >
>
>
> --
> Duy
--
Sincerely,
Dimitriy Ryazantcev
