Re: [RFC PATCH] userdiff: ship built-in driver config file

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am 19.06.19 um 20:39 schrieb Jeff King:
> But without that, I have to wonder what problem we are really solving.

You have a point here.

> Now it's baked into the binary. Later it will be baked into the
> distribution, but we still don't want anybody to touch it because their
> changes will be overwritten.

Having the patterns outside the binary reduces our mental barrier to
accept additional patterns or slightly modified patterns for new file
types, like we had recently for octave that are just a small extension
to the matlab patterns.

But we are not solving a technical problem or a problem our users have,
AFAICS.

> I guess it's a little easier for somebody
> to find .../share/git-core/userdiff and use it as a template than it is
> to find the definitions in the source. But it's not exactly easy.

Having a slightly easiser to discover database may count as an advantage. ;)

-- Hannes



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux