Re: [PATCH 0/2] a few more redundant system include cleanups

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 8:53 AM Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Thanks, this looks good to me. I fixed the system headers in xinclude.h,
> but didn't think to check for individual C files including them.

also noticed that after the refactoring some files will include a couple
of headers twice (not an issue, though thanks to the header guards)
but didn't send that patch to reduce the churn and avoid confusion.

> I did a quick grep for similar cases, and didn't find any that I think
> would be problematic. There were a few cleanups, below.

would you mind if I add your 2 patches to a series and include that
missing one?, that way I'll also have a chance to write a better commit
message from my original change, including the other feedback I got
as well

Carlo

PS. is there a recommendation on how to version a patch that move
into a series that would be preferred?



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux