Re: [RFC PATCH 1/3] trace2: correct trace2 field name documentation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2019.06.12 11:00, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Josh Steadmon <steadmon@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> > Correct the api-trace2 documentation, which lists "signal" as an
> > expected field for the signal event type, but which actually outputs
> > "signo" as the field name.
> 
> 
> Nice.  Is this one of the findings made by your validation, by the way?

Yes. I based both versions of the schema purely off the documentation, then
tested against real output. This was the only discrepancy that was uncovered.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux