Re: [RFC/PATCH 0/5] Fix fetch regression with transport helpers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> writes:

>> I vaguely recall seeing just one 'x' once. I think last time I had a
>> problem with truncating st_ino, but that should be fixed in e66ceca94b
>> (clone: fix colliding file detection on APFS, 2018-11-20). So no idea
>> how this happens again.
>
> Good catch. I think the reason it happens again is simply that Junio
> picked a base commit that is older than the commit you referenced.

Yeah, that is because the patch specifically targetted a single
commit as culprit, so naturally the topic that introduced that
commit was the place to be "fixed" ;-)

I was wondering if the base commit _before_ the fixes, i.e. e198b3a7
("fetch: replace string-list used as a look-up table with a
hashmap", 2018-09-25), failed the same test you saw problems with.
It does predate e66ceca9 ("clone: fix colliding file detection on
APFS", 2018-11-20), so my current theory is that it was broken
already adn these patches that fixed a breakge had nothing to do
with the t5601 tests failing.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux