On Tue, Jun 4, 2019 at 8:03 AM Johannes Sixt <j6t@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Am 04.06.19 um 00:00 schrieb Drew DeVault: > > On Mon Jun 3, 2019 at 11:09 PM Johannes Sixt wrote: > >> I have to wonder how --check works when 'am' applies multiple patches. > >> > >> When the second patch in a patch series depends on that the first patch > >> is fully applied, what does --check do? Without the first patch applied, > >> then a naive check of the second patch will certainly fail, doesn't it? > > > > Yeah, this was being discussed in another thread. It'll fail if the > > second patch relies on changes from the first. Open to suggestions on > > how to improve that, but I think it can be improved in a later patch. I think both features could be useful. For example sometimes a maintainer might want to know if applying only a patch that is in the middle of a patch series (for example something security related) could work without having to apply the previous patchs. So maybe both a --check and a --dry-run with different behavior regarding patch series would make sense.
