Am 03.06.19 um 16:25 schrieb Drew DeVault: > +--check:: > + Instead of applying the patch(es), see if they are > + applicable to the current working tree and/or the index > + file and detects errors. I have to wonder how --check works when 'am' applies multiple patches. When the second patch in a patch series depends on that the first patch is fully applied, what does --check do? Without the first patch applied, then a naive check of the second patch will certainly fail, doesn't it? -- Hannes