Re: [bug?] clean: Demonstrate failure when used with paths

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 12:58 PM Rafael Ascensão <rafa.almas@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> I missed this RFC series which fixes this and others issues:
> https://public-inbox.org/git/20180405173446.32372-1-newren@xxxxxxxxx
>
> Cheers,
> Rafael Ascensão

Yeah, I've had cleaning that patch series up on my TODO list for quite
some time.

My vague recollection was that Peff pointed out a few things to clean
up in my patches, and also highlighted a few extra adjacent issues in
the surrounding underlying code...and when I started looking into
fixing the additional stuff it was slightly more complex and ugly (and
for some reason I didn't decide to just fix up and submit what I had
but was trying to fix everything in the area).

Also, briefly looking back at the cover letter and thread overview it
looks like no one ever attempted to shed light on the question I asked
in my RFC about what correct behavior was for one special case (i.e.
whether patches 5 & 6 of that series should be kept or whether they
should be dropped and patch 7 should be squashed into earlier
patches).  Anyone have thoughts on that?

Elijah




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux