Hi Randall, On Sun, 2 Jun 2019, Randall S. Becker wrote: > Just a few small nits from RC2 test results on the NonStop TNS/E > platform: > > 1. t0021 subtest 15 is being flakey. It fails on the first run (make -k > test) but succeeds when run in isolation. This is new on the NonStop > TNS/E platform. t0021 has been a bit flakey in the past, but not > recently. Just thought I'd mention it. It's only slightly disconcerting > because I make very heavy use of smudge filters but since it runs fine > in isolation, I'm going to assume it is fine. We had one unsubstantiated > report of an occasional misfire of smudge filters, but no substantive > evidence at this point to reproduce the situation. t0021.15 is indeed flaky, and not only for NonStop. It is so flaky, even, that I opened https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/issues/241 > 2. t7519 subtest 25 still does not pass (previously reported for RC1) > when run via "make -k test" the first time. This runs successfully when > run in isolation or the second time. I offered a fix for that in js/fsmonitor-unflake, and it already made it into `next` (and hopefully into v2.22.0) as you can see here: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/commit/b5a81697520 (look for the branch symbol below the commit message). > 3. t9001, t9020, t9600, t9601, t9602, t9604, fail, but should not run on > platform (not new, just a reminder). We do not have sendmail or > subversion. At least for Subversion, this should be detected. For send-email, I don't know... There *was* a bug in t9001 where it failed to mark a send-email tests cases with the `PERL` prerequisite, but that was fixed, and I guess you have Perl anyway? Ciao, Johannes
