Re: ab/send-email-transferencoding-fix, was Re: What's cooking in git.git (May 2019, #04; Tue, 28)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> writes:

>> Yeah, I recall that one from previous week.  Let's queue it on top
>> (and find the right place tos quash it in).
>
> Sorry, I was unclear. The commit to amend is the tip one: "send-email: fix
> regression in sendemail.identity parsing".

No need to be sorry---I found it out after applying and for a single
liner, it is trivial to see which commit it needs to be squashed
into ;)

FWIW, I learned to try to respond as early as possible to help
unblock other people, and as a consequence, my response may come
before I know exactly what the task is, or when I can get to the
task that I promise in my response.  When I wrote the above, I
didn't exactly recall how many tests your follow-up patch I saw
earlier (or the one you sent this time) was adding prerequisites,
and I didn't yet know how involved it would be to find where it
applies when I wrote my response.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux