On Sun, Jul 15, 2007 at 03:42:12PM +0200, Alex Riesen wrote: > Sven Verdoolaege, Sun, Jul 15, 2007 13:51:48 +0200: > > I agree that fetching should probably be left as a separate operation, > > but if you have all the data, then I find it very inconvenient that > > every time you switch to a different commit you have to update > > all the subprojects separately too. > > I found I do _not_ need to do it every time I switch to a different > commit. Ok. Then I guess we have different needs and I should only do it if some config option is set if I ever try to resend the patch. > > The update in the superproject would fail if the subproject is dirty > > (just as with files.) > > Haven't noticed this yet. Merge ignores subprojects. What do you mean? > I mean that if such a feature would be implemented, then it wouldn't go ahead with the update if some of the subprojects couldn't be updated. skimo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
