On 7/15/07, Alex Riesen <raa.lkml@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Marco Costalba, Sun, Jul 15, 2007 12:06:53 +0200: > > Hope this clears any doubts regarding (supposed) slowness of Qt classes. No, it does not. Look at the implementation of memchr.
If this is the implementation you refer: http://www.google.com/codesearch?hl=it&q=+lang:c+license:gpl+package:libc+memchr+show:6Tvt4_C8w_Q:Sdpf5XO0rrM:Emqlj8d07Ns&sa=N&cd=4&ct=rc&cs_p=http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/glibc/glibc-2.2.1.tar.gz&cs_f=glibc-2.2.1/sysdeps/i386/bits/string.h#a0 I would say that I would prefer to avoid assemply and Qt libs seems to do the same, perhaps for portability, but it's only a guess. Anyway with the proposed patch to git you don't need assembly at all (to me it's would seem an overkill) Marco - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
