Am 18.05.19 um 05:46 schrieb Boxuan Li: > Octave pattern is almost the same as matlab, except > that '%%%' and '##' can also be used to begin code sections, > in addition to '%%' that is understood by both. Octave > pattern is merged into Matlab pattern. Test cases for > the hunk header patterns of matlab and octave under > t/t4018 are added. Thank you! This patch looks good. With or without the grammar and style fixes below: Acked-by: Johannes Sixt <j6t@xxxxxxxx> Junio will very likely appreciate if you resend with these fixes applied. > > Signed-off-by: Boxuan Li <liboxuan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > v1: use matlab pattern for octave > v2: add a new octave pattern > v3: fix indentation problem of v2 > v4: improve doc and commit message > v5: merge octave pattern into matlab and add test cases > --- > diff --git a/Documentation/gitattributes.txt b/Documentation/gitattributes.txt > index 4fb20cd0e9..e657a6b7b7 100644 > --- a/Documentation/gitattributes.txt > +++ b/Documentation/gitattributes.txt > @@ -819,7 +819,7 @@ patterns are available: > > - `java` suitable for source code in the Java language. > > -- `matlab` suitable for source code in the MATLAB language. > +- `matlab` suitable for source code in the MATLAB and Octave language. s/language/languages/ > > - `objc` suitable for source code in the Objective-C language. > > diff --git a/userdiff.c b/userdiff.c > index 3a78fbf504..bcae006abe 100644 > --- a/userdiff.c > +++ b/userdiff.c > @@ -58,7 +58,10 @@ PATTERNS("java", > "|[-+*/<>%&^|=!]=" > "|--|\\+\\+|<<=?|>>>?=?|&&|\\|\\|"), > PATTERNS("matlab", > - "^[[:space:]]*((classdef|function)[[:space:]].*)$|^%%[[:space:]].*$", > + /* Octave pattern is mostly the same as matlab, except that '%%%' and > + * '##' can also be used to begin code sections, in addition to '%%' > + * that is understood by both. */ /* * We write multi-line * comments like this. */ > + "^[[:space:]]*((classdef|function)[[:space:]].*)$|^(%%%?|##)[[:space:]].*$", > "[a-zA-Z_][a-zA-Z0-9_]*|[-+0-9.e]+|[=~<>]=|\\.[*/\\^']|\\|\\||&&"), > PATTERNS("objc", > /* Negate C statements that can look like functions */ > -- Hannes