Re: Draft release notes for v1.5.3, as of -rc1

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> writes:

> It is really unfortunate that rewrite-commits came in so late in the 
> release cycle, and I am quite sure it should not be in 1.5.3.  There is 
> just too much new in it, and too many things to flesh out.
>
> Junio, if you want to include it in 1.5.3, it should be marked as alpha 
> code, as it has not seen any time in "next", let alone "master".

I am not considering rewrite-commits for inclusion right now.

I was hoping that filter-branch will stay.  Its interface is
something people are already familiar with since the days of its
its older incarnation cg-admin-rewritehist, and it would be
really really nice that anything that attempts to replace it
builds on and extends its external interface.

Maybe rewrite-commits can be used to delegate the implementation
of heavy lifting from filter-branch?  IOW can the latter be
just a thin wrapper around the former?

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux