When this function was extracted in 0041bf6544 (name-rev: refactor logic
to see if a new candidate is a better name, 2017-03-29), it ended up
getting more arguments than it needs.
It's possible we may later use these values to evaluate the name, but
since it's a static function with a single caller, it will be easy to
add them back then.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx>
---
builtin/name-rev.c | 5 +----
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/builtin/name-rev.c b/builtin/name-rev.c
index 05ccf53e00..16df43473a 100644
--- a/builtin/name-rev.c
+++ b/builtin/name-rev.c
@@ -40,9 +40,7 @@ static void set_commit_rev_name(struct commit *commit, struct rev_name *name)
}
static int is_better_name(struct rev_name *name,
- const char *tip_name,
timestamp_t taggerdate,
- int generation,
int distance,
int from_tag)
{
@@ -103,8 +101,7 @@ static void name_rev(struct commit *commit,
name = xmalloc(sizeof(rev_name));
set_commit_rev_name(commit, name);
goto copy_data;
- } else if (is_better_name(name, tip_name, taggerdate,
- generation, distance, from_tag)) {
+ } else if (is_better_name(name, taggerdate, distance, from_tag)) {
copy_data:
name->tip_name = tip_name;
name->taggerdate = taggerdate;
--
2.21.0.1382.g4c6032d436
