Re: [PATCH 1/2] builtin/tag: do not omit -v gpg out for --format

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> So we're going to stop setting OMIT_STATUS ever, which makes sense.
> 
> It took me a minute to figure out here that the behavior for VERBOSE is
> not changed, because we _overwrite_ flags, rather than just setting a
> single bit. But that's definitely the right thing to do when there's a
> format (both before and after your patch).
> 
> So this looks good to me. I think we should probably cover it with a
> test in t7004.

Yes, that's something that surprised me originally, as these changes
don't make the test suite break in any way...

I'll add a patch to the series with a test for this.

Thanks for the review!
-Santiago.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux