Re: Better handling of local changes in 'gitk'?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Fri, 13 Jul 2007, Paul Mackerras wrote:
> 
> I should add that I'm sure that gitk won't yet do the right thing if
> there are files in the index at other than stage 0, or if the local
> changes are the result of an incomplete merge.  (In the latter case I
> suppose one or other of the fake commits should have multiple parents,
> but I don't have the infrastructure to add fake commits with multiple
> parents yet.)

That would be beautiful to see, indeed, when you're in the middle of a 
merge. "gitk --merge" already does most of it, but actually seeing the 
diff of the currently merged stuff would be pretty darn cool.

		Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux