Re: Better handling of local changes in 'gitk'?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Fri, 13 Jul 2007, Paul Mackerras wrote:
> 
> Try this, let me know what you think.  I called the changes in the
> working directory "Local uncommitted changes, not checked in to index"
> and the changes in the index "Local changes checked in to index but
> not committed".

ACK.

This matches exactly what I was thinking of.

The red vs magenta looks a bit too close in color for me (red, green and 
blue?), but quite frankly, it's not like I really care.

Those author/date fields look really empty, but that's probably a good way 
to emphasize that they aren't real commits, so while it's visually a bit 
strange, it probably is the right thing to do.

		Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux