Re: [PATCH v2 5/8] Documentation: add Packfile URIs design doc

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Apr 24 2019, Jonathan Nieder wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
>
>> This is really orthagonal to this series, but wouldn't a better
>> resumption strategy here be to walk the pack we just downloaded, run the
>> equivalent of 'commit-graph write' on it to figure out likely "tip"
>> commits, and use those in "have" lines to negotiate with the server the
>> next time around?
>
> Do you mean this for when a pack is self-contained and contains all
> objects reachable from those "tip" commits?
>
> What would you do when a pack is not self-contained in that way?

Indeed, it had been a while since I read the first version of this. I
was assuming a "base pack" use-case, but it seems it's narrowly isolated
to just "N packs each containing one big blob", right?




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux