Fredrik Tolf wrote: > When I develop for myself, I usually commit incrementally quite a > bit, if for no other reason because Git won't let me switch between > branches if I don't commit first. I usually try to keep my commits > well-defined, but I don't manage to get anywhere close to what I see > when I look at the history of Linux or Git. First, if you commit only to switch branches you can always instead of adding commit on top of whis WIP commit, just --amend it. Second, there is git-stash just created for saving state to go back to it. Third, I guess that the neat patch series are result of reworking existing series using tools like StGIT (which I use and find very nice to work with, going and correcting back and forth between patches in series), or guilt (similar to StGIT), or git-gui, or new interactive mode of git-rebase, or git-cherry-pick... -- Jakub Narebski Warsaw, Poland ShadeHawk on #git - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
