Re: [PATCH v5 00/16] Many promisor remotes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Christian Couder <christian.couder@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> This patch series is based on:
>
> 763fb763b8 (Merge branch 'jt/batch-fetch-blobs-in-diff' into jch, 2019-04-08)
>
> to avoid issues with jt/batch-fetch-blobs-in-diff.

Yuck.  As an experienced contributor, you should know better than
that by now to do that.  A merge into jch/pu are rebuilt at least
once and often three times a day, and in no way a good solid base
to build on top.

If you really need to depend on another topic or two, please base
your work on a merge between 'master' (or some well known ancestor
of it) and the tips of the topics instead.

Having said that, I thought that the semantic conflict has been
corrected and the machinery to rebuild 'pu' has been replaying the
correct resolution ever since, so there was no need for such a
rebase?  Isn't it the case and do we still have the breakage due to
semantic conflict with JTan's topic in 'pu'?



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux