On 04/10, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Thomas Gummerer <t.gummerer@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > On 04/10, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > > >> * tg/stash-in-c-show-default-to-p-fix (2019-03-21) 1 commit > >> (merged to 'next' on 2019-04-10 at 9489a31a36) > >> + stash: setup default diff output format if necessary > >> (this branch uses ps/stash-in-c; is tangled with js/stash-in-c-pathspec-fix and tb/stash-in-c-unused-param-fix.) > >> > >> A regression fix. > >> > >> Will merge to 'master'. > > > > ps/stash-in-c is still marked as "Will cook in 'next'", so I assume > > since this is fixing a regression in that topic, "Will merge to > > 'master'" is a mistake here? > > Thanks. I actually intend to unfreeze ps/stash-in-c and topics that > fix it, now this topic is also ready to go. So I'd rather mark them > all for 'master', and give all of them exposure so that we can smoke > out remaining issues, if any. Ah cool, that definitely sounds good to me! I was just wondering because it looked like you had the intention of keeping the others in next, so I thought I'd flag it, just in case there was an oversight.
