Martin Ågren wrote: > I think what's happening could be related to the fix in the first patch. > There, it's ok to explicitly escape only the first '. The second one is > matched to it and gets escaped implicitly. Something like that could be > happening here, too, just that we don't want it to. (Should we escape > the implicit escaping? ...) Just speculation, though. It could well be a similar issue. I think I tried adding an escape to the existing \* and/or to elsewhere in the block of text, without success. But I didn't try very hard though, as adjusting the test to use `*` seemed like an improvement. Thanks, -- Todd
