On Tue, Apr 09 2019, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > >>> Yup. Just wanted to get the patch to test what we do *currently* out, >>> might loop back to finishing up the rest of this. >> >> Junio: *ping* about picking up this trivial test coverage improvement > > I was waiting for you to make up your mind about your earlier "might > loop back to finishing up". For a topic like this, for which the > ball has been in your court for a long time, just resending would be > easier to handle than pinging, as I do not remember much about the > original attempt anyway ;-) I don't know when I'll get to finishing the rest of it. I'll leave it up to you if you want to queue just the test patch or drop it. I figured I'd re-send just that since I figured just fixing the blindspot of the current behavior would be a good thing on its own, not as an endorsement of the current behavior, just a "this is the current known behavior" regression test.
