Re: [GSoC][RFC] Proposal: Make pack access code thread-safe

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Matheus

On 08/04/2019 18:04, Matheus Tavares Bernardino wrote:
Another "32-bit problem" should also be expressly considered during the
GSoC work because of the MS Windows definition of uInt / long to be only
32 bits, leading to much of the Git code failing on the Git for Windows
port and on the Git LFS (for Windows) for packs and files greater than
4Gb.https://github.com/git-for-windows/git/issues/1063

Thanks for pointing it out. I didn't get it, thought, if your
suggestion was to also propose tackling this issue in this GSoC
project. Was it that? I read the link but it seems to be a kind of
unrelated problem from what I'm planing to do with the pack access
code (which is tread-safety). I may have understood this wrongly,
though. Please, let me know if that's the case :)

The main point was to avoid accidental regressions by re-introducing simple 'longs' where memsized types were more appropriate.

Torsten has already done a lot of work at https://github.com/tboegi/git/tree/tb.190402_1552_convert_size_t_only_git_master_181124_mk_size_t

HTH
Philip
(I'm off line for a few days)



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux