Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > I've been meaning to follow-up on > https://public-inbox.org/git/20190204161217.20047-1-avarab@xxxxxxxxx/ > where I among other things wanted to just have these instances all say > "commits will be abbreviated as described in XYZ in linkgit:<something>" > and summarize what happens there. Thanks for a pointer. I do recall that I found that one very promising. I can see from https://public-inbox.org/git/xmqq7eefv02i.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ that I was mostly OK with the end-user facing documentation part, and also from https://public-inbox.org/git/xmqq36p3uxq2.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ I was OK with the idea of exposing the computation but found that the exact command option it was done with was suboptimal; neither of these was pointing out any incorrectable flaw). > I don't mind if this goes in, I mainly wrote this E-Mail as a brain dump > since it jolted my memory on the topic, and so that I could dig it up > later & see how I intended to follow-up on those #leftoverbits
