SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > I wonder whether it would be worth amending 07353d9042 to keep > 'kill_p4d' around as a wrapper around 'stop_and_cleanup_p4d' for the > time being. I think renaming was the right thing to do; "show --cc" shows that the post-image lives in the new world order where calling kill_p4d is not usually needed clearly with a hunk that replaces kill_p4d (which only existed in the old world) with stop_and_cleanup (which exists only in the new world). Will redo the merge and teach my rerere database. Thanks.
