On Fri, Mar 15 2019, Duy Nguyen wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 7:35 PM Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
> <avarab@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> When gc.reflogExpire and gc.reflogExpireUnreachable are set to "never"
>> and --stale-fix isn't in effect (covered by the first part of the "if"
>> statement being modified here) we can exit early without pointlessly
>> looping over all the reflogs.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@xxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> builtin/reflog.c | 7 +++++++
>> t/t1410-reflog.sh | 4 +++-
>> 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/builtin/reflog.c b/builtin/reflog.c
>> index 4d3430900d..d95c77ca0e 100644
>> --- a/builtin/reflog.c
>> +++ b/builtin/reflog.c
>> @@ -606,6 +606,13 @@ static int cmd_reflog_expire(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix)
>> mark_reachable_objects(&cb.cmd.revs, 0, 0, NULL);
>> if (flags & EXPIRE_REFLOGS_VERBOSE)
>> putchar('\n');
>> + } else if (!cb.cmd.expire_total && !cb.cmd.expire_unreachable) {
>> + /*
>> + * If we're not expiring anything and not dropping
>> + * stale entries, there's no point in even opening the
>> + * reflogs, since we're guaranteed to do nothing.
>> + */
>
> I'm checking should_expire_reflog_ent(). With both of these being
> zero, we skip most of the "return 1;" except the last one
> cb->cmd.recno, added in 552cecc214 (Teach "git reflog" a subcommand to
> delete single entries, 2007-10-17). Will this shortcut affect that use
> case (I haven't spent time understanding that commit yet, gotta run
> soon)?
There was a bug related to this. Fixed in v3.
>
>> + return 0;
>> }
