Re: [PATCH v2 6/7] gc: don't run "reflog expire" when keeping reflogs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Mar 15, 2019 at 5:24 PM Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
<avarab@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 15 2019, Duy Nguyen wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 7:35 PM Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
> > <avarab@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> @@ -127,6 +140,10 @@ static void gc_config(void)
> >>                         pack_refs = git_config_bool("gc.packrefs", value);
> >>         }
> >>
> >> +       if (gc_config_is_timestamp_never("gc.reflogexpire") &&
> >> +           gc_config_is_timestamp_never("gc.reflogexpireunreachable"))
> >
> > Nit. configset api normalizes the key internally, so we can safely
> > write gc.reflogExpireUnreachable here, which is a bit easier to read.
>
> I didn't know that, do we want to do that?
>
> I'd think that as a matter of coding style always sticking to lower case
> in the C code made more sense, because e.g. you might #define a config
> key, and then use it both in git_config_*() as well as via strcmp() in
> some callback. Mixing the two would lead to confusion and possible bugs
> as we'd refactor the former of those patterns to the latter.

I did a quick git grep on "git_config_get_". The majority is still in
lower case. And given that this feature is not documented anywhere (I
had a quick look at config.h and api-config.txt and ended up checking
the code before the previous mail) yeah it's probably just safer to go
with lowercase. At least until the old callback style is gone.
-- 
Duy




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux