When the commit-graph is written we end up calling
parse_commit(). This will in turn invoke code that'll consult the
existing commit-graph about the commit, if the graph is corrupted we
die.
We thus get into a state where a failing "commit-graph verify" can't
be followed-up with a "commit-graph write" if core.commitGraph=true is
set, the graph either needs to be manually removed to proceed, or
core.commitGraph needs to be set to "false".
Change the "commit-graph write" codepath to use a new
parse_commit_no_graph() helper instead of parse_commit() to avoid
this. The latter will call repo_parse_commit_internal() with
use_commit_graph=1 as seen in 177722b344 ("commit: integrate commit
graph with commit parsing", 2018-04-10).
Not using the old graph at all slows down the writing of the new graph
by some small amount, but is a sensible way to prevent an error in the
existing commit-graph from spreading.
Just fixing the current issue would be likely to result in code that's
inadvertently broken in the future. New code might use the
commit-graph at a distance. To detect such cases introduce a
"GIT_TEST_COMMIT_GRAPH_DIE_ON_LOAD" setting used when we do our
corruption tests, and test that a "write/verify" combo works after
every one of our current test cases where we now detect commit-graph
corruption.
Some of the code changes here might be strictly unnecessary, e.g. I
was unable to find cases where the parse_commit() called from
write_graph_chunk_data() didn't exit early due to
"item->object.parsed" being true in
repo_parse_commit_internal() (before the use_commit_graph=1 has any
effect). But let's also convert those cases for good measure, we do
not have exhaustive tests for all possible types of commit-graph
corruption.
This might need to be re-visited if we learn to write the commit-graph
incrementally, but probably not. Hopefully we'll just start by finding
out what commits we have in total, then read the old graph(s) to see
what they cover, and finally write a new graph file with everything
that's missing. In that case the new graph writing code just needs to
continue to use e.g. a parse_commit() that doesn't consult the
existing commit-graphs.
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@xxxxxxxxx>
---
commit-graph.c | 10 +++++++---
commit-graph.h | 1 +
commit.h | 6 ++++++
t/t5318-commit-graph.sh | 11 +++++++++--
4 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/commit-graph.c b/commit-graph.c
index d945e8f3e0..6b3ade9496 100644
--- a/commit-graph.c
+++ b/commit-graph.c
@@ -281,6 +281,10 @@ static int prepare_commit_graph(struct repository *r)
struct object_directory *odb;
int config_value;
+ if (git_env_bool(GIT_TEST_COMMIT_GRAPH_DIE_ON_LOAD, 0))
+ die("Dying as requested by the '%s' variable on commit-graph load!",
+ GIT_TEST_COMMIT_GRAPH_DIE_ON_LOAD);
+
if (r->objects->commit_graph_attempted)
return !!r->objects->commit_graph;
r->objects->commit_graph_attempted = 1;
@@ -545,7 +549,7 @@ static void write_graph_chunk_data(struct hashfile *f, int hash_len,
uint32_t packedDate[2];
display_progress(progress, ++*progress_cnt);
- parse_commit(*list);
+ parse_commit_no_graph(*list);
hashwrite(f, get_commit_tree_oid(*list)->hash, hash_len);
parent = (*list)->parents;
@@ -742,7 +746,7 @@ static void close_reachable(struct packed_oid_list *oids, int report_progress)
display_progress(progress, i + 1);
commit = lookup_commit(the_repository, &oids->list[i]);
- if (commit && !parse_commit(commit))
+ if (commit && !parse_commit_no_graph(commit))
add_missing_parents(oids, commit);
}
stop_progress(&progress);
@@ -991,7 +995,7 @@ void write_commit_graph(const char *obj_dir,
continue;
commits.list[commits.nr] = lookup_commit(the_repository, &oids.list[i]);
- parse_commit(commits.list[commits.nr]);
+ parse_commit_no_graph(commits.list[commits.nr]);
for (parent = commits.list[commits.nr]->parents;
parent; parent = parent->next)
diff --git a/commit-graph.h b/commit-graph.h
index 36d8109901..6021ababa2 100644
--- a/commit-graph.h
+++ b/commit-graph.h
@@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
#include "cache.h"
#define GIT_TEST_COMMIT_GRAPH "GIT_TEST_COMMIT_GRAPH"
+#define GIT_TEST_COMMIT_GRAPH_DIE_ON_LOAD "GIT_TEST_COMMIT_GRAPH_DIE_ON_LOAD"
struct commit;
diff --git a/commit.h b/commit.h
index 42728c2906..5d33477e78 100644
--- a/commit.h
+++ b/commit.h
@@ -89,6 +89,12 @@ static inline int repo_parse_commit(struct repository *r, struct commit *item)
{
return repo_parse_commit_gently(r, item, 0);
}
+
+static inline int parse_commit_no_graph(struct commit *commit)
+{
+ return repo_parse_commit_internal(the_repository, commit, 0, 0);
+}
+
#ifndef NO_THE_REPOSITORY_COMPATIBILITY_MACROS
#define parse_commit_internal(item, quiet, use) repo_parse_commit_internal(the_repository, item, quiet, use)
#define parse_commit_gently(item, quiet) repo_parse_commit_gently(the_repository, item, quiet)
diff --git a/t/t5318-commit-graph.sh b/t/t5318-commit-graph.sh
index 1cb0355c7e..d146cf4982 100755
--- a/t/t5318-commit-graph.sh
+++ b/t/t5318-commit-graph.sh
@@ -377,7 +377,13 @@ corrupt_graph_verify() {
test_must_fail git commit-graph verify 2>test_err &&
grep -v "^+" test_err >err &&
test_i18ngrep "$grepstr" err &&
- git status --short
+ if test "$2" != "no-copy"
+ then
+ cp $objdir/info/commit-graph commit-graph-pre-write-test
+ fi &&
+ git status --short &&
+ GIT_TEST_COMMIT_GRAPH_DIE_ON_LOAD=true git commit-graph write &&
+ git commit-graph verify
}
# usage: corrupt_graph_and_verify <position> <data> <string> [<zero_pos>]
@@ -403,7 +409,7 @@ corrupt_graph_and_verify() {
test_expect_success POSIXPERM,SANITY 'detect permission problem' '
corrupt_graph_setup &&
chmod 000 $objdir/info/commit-graph &&
- corrupt_graph_verify "Could not open"
+ corrupt_graph_verify "Could not open" "no-copy"
'
test_expect_success 'detect too small' '
@@ -522,6 +528,7 @@ test_expect_success 'git fsck (checks commit-graph)' '
git fsck &&
corrupt_graph_and_verify $GRAPH_BYTE_FOOTER "\00" \
"incorrect checksum" &&
+ cp commit-graph-pre-write-test $objdir/info/commit-graph &&
test_must_fail git fsck
'
--
2.21.0.360.g471c308f928
