Re: [WIP] Get rid of msys in favor of busybox port for windows

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 7/10/07, Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> wrote:
Hi,

On Tue, 10 Jul 2007, Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy wrote:

> On 7/10/07, Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 10 Jul 2007, Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy wrote:
> >
> > > I'm integrating some code from busybox to mingw tree so that mingw port
> > > can work without msys. Posix utilities such as sed, awk, head, tail...
> > > seem to work well. The main obstacle is ash, which is no where near
> > > usable state (fork issues as always). Busybox ash is about 13000 lines
> > > of code, not too big.
> > >
> > > Anyone interested in?
> >
> > Definitely.
> >
> > Last time I wanted to assess how much work it is to compile that on MinGW,
> > though, it seemed to be too much to be tractable.
>
> The exact answer is "I don't know" :-) I cross compile all the time
> however it should build fine on MinGW as it now uses git Makefile.
> I'll push the patch into mob soon.

Do you mean the whole busybox thing?

If so, please do not put it into mingw.git.  Rather, start a busybox.git
project (I saw that you have already some projects on repo.or.cz, so it
should be easy for you.)

No, I don't port the whole busybox (too big, too difficult). I
extracted stuffs that need to run shell scripts (mainly coreutils and
ash) and put them in my mingw tree. Just wanted to push it if you
wanted to try.. maybe later.

--
Duy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux