Re: [WIP] Get rid of msys in favor of busybox port for windows

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 7/10/07, Henning Rogge <hrogge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 7/10/07, Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy <pclouds@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I'm integrating some code from busybox to mingw tree so that mingw
> port can work without msys. Posix utilities such as sed, awk, head,
> tail... seem to work well. The main obstacle is ash, which is no where
> near usable state (fork issues as always). Busybox ash is about 13000
> lines of code, not too big.
>
> Anyone interested in?
If I can use it without needing a "vi/vim" implementation I'm interested !

There is no vi/vim in the port :-) My goal is to make shell scripts
work with minimum effort. I don't even attempt to make ash
interactively usable (well, git add --interactive and friends have to
wait longer).
--
Duy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux