Re: [PATCH v3 10/21] checkout: split part of it to new command 'switch'

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Elijah Newren <newren@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

>> I think sometimes a 3-way merge creates marker conflicts in file, and
>> this does not look easy to reverse when switching back. If it's true
>> and we can detect it, we can still abort this case (i.e. requiring -m

Paths with actual conflicts are much easier to recover from than
paths that cleanly merge.   You have your original in stage #2, so
you should be able to "restore-path --stage=2 --from-stage path..."
them.  Once the contents are auto-resolved cleanly, however, the
cached contents are automaticaly updated to the auto-resolved result,
and it needs more work to reverse the effect of the merge (it is
doable, of course, as you know exactly the contents of the
switched-to branch and the contents of the switching-from branch, so
it is just the matter of running 3-way merge in the right direction
to recover what used to be in the working tree).



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux