On Mon, Jul 09, 2007 at 03:13:54PM -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > Tuning for such an extreme without impacting normal cases is rather > hard. > > My patch was meant to be used on top of yours. Is that what you tested? > > Also I'd suggest you do not use a max depth of 1000. It is simply > insane and might possibly make the existing logic less effective. Even > for runtime pack access you want it to be reasonably short, say 100 > maximum, or even the current default of 50. Any improvements you might > come with (like automatic depth determined on replay cost) should be > compared with that default which is known to work well already. No, I didn't try it on top of mine; sorry. I'll try that out. I realize a depth of 1000 is nuts, I'm just using it to expose any suboptimal delta selection for the nasty versions.lisp-expr case, since I know that with a window size of 100 it should be easy to keep it from growing too deep. -bcd - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
