Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes: > I agree that sanitize_refname_format() would be nice, but I'm pretty > sure it's going to end up having to duplicate many of the rules from > check_refname_format(). Which is ugly if the two ever get out of sync. > > But if we could write it in a way that keeps the actual policy logic in > one factored-out portion, I think it would be worth doing. Yeah, I do too. In the meantime, let's call v3 sufficient improvement from the current state for now and queue it.
