Re: [PATCH 0/3] prettier bisect output

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes:

> I've run across this many times, too. Since it's been bugging me for a
> decade, I thought I'd finally try to address it. Here are some patches.
>
> There was some discussion about a year ago about just using "git show"
> for this output:
>
>   https://public-inbox.org/git/CAP8UFD3QhTUj+j3vBGrm0sTQ2dSOLS-m2_PwFj6DZS4VZHKRTQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
>
> Christian seemed generally OK with tweaking the output, but preferred
> not to move all the way to running an external "git show". I'm not sure
> I completely agree, but it was easy enough to get the results I wanted
> just by fiddling the current code a bit. ;)
>
>   [1/3]: bisect: use string arguments to feed internal diff-tree
>   [2/3]: bisect: fix internal diff-tree config loading
>   [3/3]: bisect: make diff-tree output prettier
>
>  bisect.c                    | 19 +++++--------------
>  t/t6030-bisect-porcelain.sh |  6 +++---
>  2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

Looks good from a quick glance.

One unrelated thing that made me curious was that the output from

	git grep 'is the first '

had these two lines:

bisect.c:		printf("%s is the first %s commit\n", oid_to_hex(bisect_rev),
git-bisect.sh:		if sane_grep "is the first $TERM_BAD commit" "$GIT_DIR/BISECT_RUN" >/dev/null

which means that we cannot localize this message without thought,
unlike the usual "hey, this is end-user facing, so wrap it in _()
out of spinal reflex."




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux