Hi, Randall S. Becker wrote: > On February 21, 2019 15:00, I wrote: >> t9020 subtests 1,2,5,6 failed - Not new. unsurprising as there is no SVN or >> perl with SVN module on platform. It might be useful to have a detection to >> skip of Perl SVN is not present. > > While this is a bit of a hack, it might be useful for skipping t9020 in > environments where the svn.remote package is not installed. I can make this > into a patch if this style is reasonable - guessing probably not and that > the REMOTE_SVN test should go elsewhere if it is called that. Jeff King sent an RFC patch which would remove this test and the rest of the vcs-svn experiment in August[1]. Jonathan Nieder replied as one user who would rather see it moved to contrib/, so it was held off. Whether that has any impact on adding a way to skip all the tests here, I don't know. Maybe it's a gentle nudge in favor of moving them to contrib? [1] https://public-inbox.org/git/20180817190310.GA5360@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ -- Todd
