From: Nickolai Belakovski <nbelakovski@xxxxxxxxx> I've made the various cosmetic changes that were suggested, as well as adding tests for 3/3 I don't have a particularly strong opinion on the subject of keeping the atom as "worktreepath" or changing it to "worktree:path". We did feel earlier in this thread that if we went with "worktree:path", then "worktree" is somewhat ambiguous, and that discussion led to deciding to have "worktree" return the path,. After that I chose to name it "worktreepath" because I like to make things explicit and intuitive. Travis CI results: https://travis-ci.org/nbelakovski/git/builds/494817576 Nickolai Belakovski (3): ref-filter: add worktreepath atom branch: update output to include worktree info branch: add worktree info on verbose output Documentation/git-branch.txt | 12 ++++-- Documentation/git-for-each-ref.txt | 5 +++ builtin/branch.c | 16 ++++++-- ref-filter.c | 78 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ t/t3200-branch.sh | 8 ++-- t/t3203-branch-output.sh | 38 +++++++++++++++++++ t/t6302-for-each-ref-filter.sh | 11 ++++++ 7 files changed, 156 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) -- 2.14.2
