Re: [PATCH] git-rebase.txt: update to reflect merge now implemented on sequencer

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Elijah,

On Thu, 14 Feb 2019, Elijah Newren wrote:

> Since commit 8fe9c3f21dff (Merge branch 'en/rebase-merge-on-sequencer',
> 2019-02-06), --merge now uses the interactive backend (and matches its
> behavior) so there is no separate merge backend anymore.  Fix an
> oversight in the docs that should have been updated with the previous
> change.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@xxxxxxxxx>

ACK,
Dscho

> ---
>  Documentation/git-rebase.txt | 2 --
>  1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/git-rebase.txt b/Documentation/git-rebase.txt
> index daa16403ec..619303adbc 100644
> --- a/Documentation/git-rebase.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/git-rebase.txt
> @@ -554,8 +554,6 @@ commit started empty (had no changes relative to its parent to
>  start with) or ended empty (all changes were already applied
>  upstream in other commits).
>  
> -The merge backend does the same.
> -
>  The interactive backend drops commits by default that
>  started empty and halts if it hits a commit that ended up empty.
>  The `--keep-empty` option exists for the interactive backend to allow
> -- 
> 2.21.0.rc0.269.g1a574e7a28
> 
> 



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux