Hi Elijah, On Thu, 14 Feb 2019, Elijah Newren wrote: > Since commit 8fe9c3f21dff (Merge branch 'en/rebase-merge-on-sequencer', > 2019-02-06), --merge now uses the interactive backend (and matches its > behavior) so there is no separate merge backend anymore. Fix an > oversight in the docs that should have been updated with the previous > change. > > Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@xxxxxxxxx> ACK, Dscho > --- > Documentation/git-rebase.txt | 2 -- > 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/git-rebase.txt b/Documentation/git-rebase.txt > index daa16403ec..619303adbc 100644 > --- a/Documentation/git-rebase.txt > +++ b/Documentation/git-rebase.txt > @@ -554,8 +554,6 @@ commit started empty (had no changes relative to its parent to > start with) or ended empty (all changes were already applied > upstream in other commits). > > -The merge backend does the same. > - > The interactive backend drops commits by default that > started empty and halts if it hits a commit that ended up empty. > The `--keep-empty` option exists for the interactive backend to allow > -- > 2.21.0.rc0.269.g1a574e7a28 > >