Re: [PATCH v5 1/8] technical doc: add a design doc for the evolve command

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



sxenos@xxxxxxxxxx writes:

> From: Stefan Xenos <sxenos@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> This document describes what a change graph for
> git would look like, the behavior of the evolve command,
> and the changes planned for other commands.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Xenos <sxenos@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---

It would really need a summary of what changed since the earlier
rounds, if a series this size wants to be re-read by those who
helped the previous one.

I briefly looked at the patches (and the diff against the previous
one that has been in 'pu') and saw a few comments that say "needs
further work".  What's the intention?  Unfinished but soliciting
further comments and sanity checks to help polishing the finished
parts (if that is the case that is perfectly fine, but it would help
those who want to help if you are clear about it)?

I'll read them through laster today or tomorrow with fresh set of
eyes; thanks for working on this.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux