Re: [PATCH 0/2] t/lib-gpg: a gpgsm fix, a minor improvement, and a question

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes:

> But it looks from the output like it just mentions every prereq that
> wasn't satisfied. I don't think that's particularly useful to show for
> all users, since most of them are platform things that cannot be changed
> (and you'd never get the list to zero, since some of them are mutually
> exclusive).

The only thing that could be of interest is "We are skipping tests
around $SVN, because your Git was built without a feature that
requires platform support of feature $SVN, which in turn was caused
because NO_$SVN=UnfortunatelyYes was in your config.mak.autogen
file.  You could 'apt-get install $SVN' to lift this artificial
limitation in your Git if you wanted to".

But the test prereq is probably a bit too roundabout way for that
kind of information ;-)



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux