On Thu, Feb 07, 2019 at 04:18:02AM +0000, Torsten Bögershausen wrote: > And trying to answer an older question: > > >>>The reason appears to be wrong bit mask usage > >>>#define ADD_CACHE_IGNORE_ERRORS 4 > >>>and > >>>#define HASH_RENORMALIZE 4 > > What if we had renamed "flags" like this ? > [...] > -int add_to_index(struct index_state *istate, const char *path, struct stat *st, int flags) > +int add_to_index(struct index_state *istate, const char *path, struct stat *st, int add_cache_flags) Yes, changing the name of the variable in the original patch would have caught this case. I don't know if it is worth doing now or not (the code as it is now seems pretty clear to me, but of course I've looked at it a lot lately). -Peff
