Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes: > Yep. Here it is. > > Rather than a range-diff, which is quite large due to the code movement, > I'll include below the interesting hunk of a diff between the two > endpoints (i.e., what we would have seen applying the packet-err-check > changes on top of my code movement, which is more or less what I did to > generate it). Thanks. The hunks shown below are to use packet_reader interface in check_smart_http(), which is exactly what we want to see in this step, and what I was too lazy to recreate as a part of conflict resolution ;-) Thanks, queued.
